eXTReMe Tracker WARNING: The opinions expressed and linked to in this blog are not necessarily mine (anymore).

My ideas are constantly changing as I learn. Sometimes they even change midway through writing a post.

Friday, April 14

Popper and Falsification

Popper recognized, but dismissed as unimportant,
that every falsification of a conjecture is
simultaneously a confirmation of an opposite
conjecture, and every conforming instance of a
conjecture is a falsification of an opposite

Is this true of Popper? What is the explanation for
this? How is the idea of falsification different from
a complicated version of inductivism? Why not just
call it inductivism with an extra emphasis or focus on
falsification? Or tentative falsification induction?

No comments: